Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field vs Dehkadeh Fonts (2026)

Detailed side-by-side comparison of two WordPress plugins, based on real-time data from WordPress.org.

Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field

Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field

4.6(5)

3.0K+ active installs

Free

Updated 2 years ago
View Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
VS
Dehkadeh Fonts

Dehkadeh Fonts

5(3)

900 active installs

Free

Updated 4 years ago
View Dehkadeh Fonts

Quick Verdict

As of April 2026, Dehkadeh Fonts has a higher user rating (5/5 from 3 reviews) while Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field leads in active installations (3.0K+ vs 900). Both are free WordPress plugins. Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field has accumulated 38K+ total downloads while Dehkadeh Fonts has 14K+.

Detailed Comparison

Rating
4.6/5Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts5/5
Total Reviews
5Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts3
Active Installs
3.0K+Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts900
Total Downloads
38K+Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts14K+
Support Resolution
N/AAdvanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh FontsN/A
Last Updated
2 years agoAdvanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts4 years ago
First Released
2016Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts2018
Age
10 yearsAdvanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts8 years
WP Requires
3.5.0+Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts4.2+
PHP Requires
false+Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fontsfalse+
Business Model
FreeAdvanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh FontsFree
Latest Version
3.2.3Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field
Dehkadeh Fonts1.2.0

Rating Breakdown

Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field

4.6/5(5 reviews)
5
80%
4
0%
3
20%
2
0%
1
0%

Dehkadeh Fonts

5/5(3 reviews)
5
100%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

Recent Reviews

Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field Reviews

by zdmdesigns

Does not Enqueue Font(s) Selected

Great plugin. Does exactly what it says, which is very powerful! This topic was modified 1 year, 8 months ago by zdmdesigns.

by classikd

Not bad

Great but font-weight changes are not taken into account in google fonts call…

by proyinfo

Very nice

Works very well. However, on the Font API settings page, you could add some instruction to get the key.

Dehkadeh Fonts Reviews

by arashkiani

پلاگین مفید برای کاربران فارسی زبان

این افزونه وردپرس بسیار مفید است و اگر ناشر آن به طور منظم نسخه های جدید را با ویژگی های تازه منتشر کند آینده درخشانی خواهد داشت. ممنون از شما

by nimaad

بسیار عالی است. توصیه میکنم

افزونه بسیار خوبی است. توصیه می کنم حتما استفاده کنید.

by mrfarmani

بسیار عالی است

من با چندتایی از افزونه‌هایی که فونت به سایت اضافه می‌کنند کار کردم، این کاملا فرق دارد و به نظرم بهترین افزونه ای بوده که تا حالا برای فونت استفاده کردم.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field or Dehkadeh Fonts more popular?
Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field has 3.0K+ active installations while Dehkadeh Fonts has 900. Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field is the more widely-used plugin as of April 2026.
Which has better ratings — Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field or Dehkadeh Fonts?
Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field has a 4.6/5 rating from 5 reviews, while Dehkadeh Fonts has a 5/5 rating from 3 reviews.
Are Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field and Dehkadeh Fonts free?
Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field is free and Dehkadeh Fonts is free. Both can be downloaded from the WordPress.org plugin directory.
Which plugin has better support — Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field or Dehkadeh Fonts?
Support resolution data is not available for all plugins. Check each plugin's WordPress.org support forum for current response quality.
Which plugin is updated more frequently?
Advanced Custom Fields: Typography Field was last updated 2 years ago and Dehkadeh Fonts was last updated 4 years ago.

Plugin data sourced from WordPress.org. Comparison and analysis by PluginSift.