Comfortable Reading vs Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… (2026)

Detailed side-by-side comparison of two WordPress plugins, based on real-time data from WordPress.org.

Comfortable Reading

Comfortable Reading

3.6(11)

2.0K+ active installs

Free

Updated 8 years ago
View Comfortable Reading
VS
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…

Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…

5(6)

1.0K+ active installs

Free

Updated 4 years ago
View Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…

Quick Verdict

As of April 2026, Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… has a higher user rating (5/5 from 6 reviews) while Comfortable Reading leads in active installations (2.0K+ vs 1.0K+). Both are free WordPress plugins. Comfortable Reading has accumulated 28K+ total downloads while Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… has 17K+.

Detailed Comparison

Rating
3.6/5Comfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…5/5
Total Reviews
11Comfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…6
Active Installs
2.0K+Comfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…1.0K+
Total Downloads
28K+Comfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…17K+
Support Resolution
N/AComfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…N/A
Last Updated
8 years agoComfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…4 years ago
First Released
2015Comfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…2016
Age
11 yearsComfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…10 years
WP Requires
3.0+Comfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…4.0+
PHP Requires
false+Comfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…7.0+
Business Model
FreeComfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…Free
Latest Version
1.6.6Comfortable Reading
Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…1.3.1

Rating Breakdown

Comfortable Reading

3.6/5(11 reviews)
5
64%
4
0%
3
0%
2
9%
1
27%

Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…

5/5(6 reviews)
5
100%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

Recent Reviews

Comfortable Reading Reviews

by lupusb

вшитые ссылки!

Будьте внимательны: даже при покупке премиум версии автор вставляет на ваш сайт ссылку на свой блог, пряча её в display none. В личной переписке мне ответил: чтобы была ссылка на сайт автора, у вас с

by thequ

Trial version

За полную версию надо платить деньги.

by zing182

Отличный плагин!

Плагин очень выручил, спасибо Александр! Несмотря на то, что плагин конфликтнул немного с нашей WP темой разработчик помог с установкой! Рекомендую, если вас обязали соблюсти ГОСТ…

Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… Reviews

by thehappyhipster

Works like a charm

Perfect, easy solution. Awesome that it can fetch the theme colors defined in theme.json to. Thank you for sharing!

by 4system

WOW genau das habe ich gesucht!

Einfach klasse. Vielen Dank.

by Anne Warren

This is Ok!

I used it, felt great!

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Comfortable Reading or Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… more popular?
Comfortable Reading has 2.0K+ active installations while Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… has 1.0K+. Comfortable Reading is the more widely-used plugin as of April 2026.
Which has better ratings — Comfortable Reading or Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…?
Comfortable Reading has a 3.6/5 rating from 11 reviews, while Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… has a 5/5 rating from 6 reviews.
Are Comfortable Reading and Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… free?
Comfortable Reading is free and Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… is free. Both can be downloaded from the WordPress.org plugin directory.
Which plugin has better support — Comfortable Reading or Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color…?
Support resolution data is not available for all plugins. Check each plugin's WordPress.org support forum for current response quality.
Which plugin is updated more frequently?
Comfortable Reading was last updated 8 years ago and Advanced Custom Fields: Restrict Color… was last updated 4 years ago.

Plugin data sourced from WordPress.org. Comparison and analysis by PluginSift.